Press Release Thicket

February 22, 2006

Do You Pay Per Clíck Fraud?

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 3:59 pm
Do You Pay Per Clíck Fraud?

By Kim Roach (c) 2006
The world of pay-per-click marketing started in 1997 with GoTo.com. Today they are known as Yahoo Search Marketing. What started in 1997 as a way to quickly get listed in the top of the search engines has turned into a 5.6 billion dollar industry in 2005. In fact, about 99% of Google’s revenue comes from advertising.

However, this multi-billion dollar search industry is under attack and has been for quite a while. Clíck fraud has become the greatest threat to the rapid growth of the paid search marketing sector. The Interactive Advertising Bureau estimates that 20 to 35 percent of ad clicks are fraudulent.

Who’s to blame? Clíck fraud can come from a variety of sources, including competitors, bots that simulate the human behavior of clicking on ads in web pages, or even friends of the publisher who want to “help” the publisher gain some additional clíck revenue.

However, the major search engines have received the majority of the blame, even though they are not necessarily responsible.

Yahoo has recently settled a class-action clíck fraud settlement. Under the settlement, Yahoo advertisers will be allowed to submit clíck fraud claims dating back to January 2004. Yahoo will reimburse any confirmed fraudulent clicks in cäsh, with no set limit on the amount of claims it will cover.

This year, Google has been burdened with its own clíck fraud case to the tune of 90 million dollars. Currently, the court is deciding whether to accept the search giant’s proposed $90 million settlement while roughly 50 plaintiffs are voicing their dissatisfaction with it.

Clíck fraud is certainly no small matter. It has become largër than the total magnitude of credít card fraud in the U.S.

So far, these law suits have spawned more questíons than answers for the ultimate solution to clíck fraud. Clíck fraud threatens an entire business model; one that is generating billions of dollars every year.

At this point, it’s hard to tell whether pay-per-click advertising will stand the test of time, or line up for the chopping block.

Many of the search engines are already looking for solutions.

Pay-Per Percentage

Microsoft is currently engaging in research to develop new, clíck fraud resistant advertising models. Joshua Goodman, a Principal Researcher at Microsoft has published a white paper on pay-per-percentage as a solution to click-fraud.

Pay-per-percentage is an advanced form of pay-per-impression. Within this system, someone can bid for a percentage of all impressions for certain keywords or keyword phrases over a specified period of time. In the pay-per-percentage model, clíck fraud is avoided because the advertiser is not charged any additional amount for clicks. The business model is based upon a percentage of ad impressions.

Microsoft research describes it as:

A simple method for selling advertising, pay-per-percentage of impressions, that is immune to both clíck fraud and impression fraud… ads must be shown in a truly random way, across the percentage of impressions purchased..Pre-fix match: a system that is similar to broad-match, but more compatible with pay-per-percentage… auction pay-per-percentage matches, including prefix matches in a revenue maximizing way…make it easier to sell to advertisers.”

The Google Adwords system itself was initially based on a cost-per-view model. Unfortunately, there was a lack of enthusiasm for the cost-per-impression services and they switched over to the pay-per-click model.

For the pay-per-percentage model to succeed, Microsoft will certainly have to do some things different. Their solution is outlined in the paper, “Pay-Per Percentage of Impressions: An Advertising Method that is Highly Robust to Fraud.”

Another possible solution being explored is:

Pay Per Action

Under this model, advertisers do not pay every time a user clicks on an ad. Instead, payment is only made when a clíck through leads to a desired action. This could be a purchase, filling out a form, downloading trial software, or even making a call.

This model takes much of the risk out of advertising.

In fact, Google Adsense is currently beta testing a compensation system based on CPA. If you are an adsense pubisher, this would mean that instead of getting paid for clicks or impressions, you would get paid a commission for a sale or other desired action. These ads won’t compete with the regular pay-per-click ads and will be on a separate network. However, they may be beneficial for advertisers looking to avoid clíck fraud.

Paid Inclusion

Another possible solution to pay-per-click is known as paid-inclusion. Although many of the paid inclusion companies have come and gone over the years, there is a new organization that is offering a very optimistic solution to the many pay-per-click problems we are facing today.

This organization is giving smaller search engines and directories the ability to compete with the big guns (Google, Yahoo, and MSN.) The smaller search players can attain this status by becoming part of a mass community that delivers quality advertising at a fraction of PPC costs.

The paid inclusion program offered by this community of search providers, known as the ISEDN, is a cross between the older paid inclusion models and the reigning PPC model. Purchased ads are displayed in a similar manner to the PPC ads shown by Google, but advertisers are charged on a flat fee basis, not on a per clíck basis.

The ISEDN program makes clíck fraud irrelevant because ads are displayed for a certain period of time, regardless of the number of clicks or impressions received.

Through the power of the collective community (the ISEDN currently has more than 230+ members), ISEDN paid inclusion ads are displayed over 150 million times per month. This equates to 150 million potential advertising opportunities.

Within this model, you can buy top 10 exposure across a rapidly growing network of search providers for $3 to $4 per month. If you choose to buy in volume, you can expect some significant discounts.

The ISEDN advertising model limits the sale of the same keywords or phrases to 30 advertisers. If a keyword term is sold more than 10 times, then those paid listings begin to rotate between the SERPs. So, for the worst case scenario, a listing would appear on the first page of results approximately once out of every 3 searches on most engines in the network.

This program gives advertisers the benefit of advertising with smaller search engines on a massive scale without the fear of clíck fraud. For more information on this advertising model visit ISEDN founding member ExactSeek.com.

As for Google, Yahoo, and MSN, you can definitely expect to see some changes being made with their paid search programs in the near future. The pay-per-click model is inherently flawed and must be altered to survive. Google and the other major search engines know that their business will be crippled if they do not adapt. In the meantime, there are a number of alternatives for advertisers looking for a safer solution to advertising.

About The Author
Kim Roach is a staff writer and editor for the SiteProNews and SEO-News newsletters. You can contact Kim at: kim @ seo-news.com

 

February 17, 2006

Hidden Content Sources for Your Website

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 3:57 pm
Hidden Content Sources for Your Website
By Kim Roach (c) 2006
As I travel through the Google search engine, there is one element that defines almost all of the top-ranking websites. It’s great content. People come online for information and those that offer the best content reap the greatest rewards.Unfortunately, this type of content is hard to come by. In most cases, you either have to spend hours in front of the keyboard or outsource the job to others. Both of these options are very costly. One requires your valuable time and the other requires an ínvestment of around $10 – $20 per article. 

That’s why I have scoured the net in search of valuable frëe content sources. I’m still not quite sure why I’m revealing my treasured piles of frëe content, but I certainly hope you enjoy them.

One of my favorite sources of content is public domain. This comprises the body of knowledge without a copyright. Anyone can use this material for commercial or non-commercial purposes. Below are some excellent sources for public domain material.

Project Gutenberg
Project Gutenberg is a library of 18,000 frëe ebooks whose copyright has expired. “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes”, “Pride and Prejudice”, “The Time Machine”, “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer”, and “The Canterbury Tales” have all passed into the public domain.

This means that you can put these on your website or even sell them in electronic or book format.

Explore a wealth of frëe content at Gutenberg.org.

Archive.org
At Archive.org you can find thöusands of works that are currently in the public domain. Want to put some cartoons on your web site? Take a look at the “Film Chest Vintage Cartoons”, which is full of classic animated cartoons from the 1930′s and 1940′s. The collection includes Popeye, Porky Pig, Bugs Bunny, Woody Woodpecker, The Three Stooges and Betty Boop. They also provide tons of other reproducable content including:

Brick Films: Commonly called “LEGO Movies”. Brick films are dedicated to the art of stop motion animation.

SabuCat Movie Trailers: The world’s largest collection of theatrical trailers.

Feature Films: A large number of classic feature films and shorts.

Universal Newsreels: Newsreels were shown before every feature film in the pre-tv era.

Computer Chronicles: Was the world’s most popular television program on personal technology during the height of the computer revolution.

Net Cafe: Television series covering the revolution during the height of the dot com boom.

All of these content sources are available for you to put on your website. You can find them at Archive.org.

Another popular public domain destination is Wikipedia.org. Here you will find over 1 million articles ranging from Greek mythology and Egyptian history to business, health, and technology.

Go to Wikipedia.org for a huge collection of articles you can reprint on your own website.

Creative Commons
Every creative work receives copyright protetion as soon as you put pen to paper, hit save, or press record. Because of this, no one can use that work without express permission from the author.

Creative Commons provides a new content license that allows you to share your work with others. If you want, you can even allow other people to expand upon your existing work. This allows for creative co-authorship.

The Creative Commons license has made piles of content available for use on your web site. Whether you are looking for audio, images, video, or text, you can find an abundance of reusable information within the creative commons.

To search for content to put on your own web site, go to CreativeCommons.org.

Government Web Sites
Works produced by the U.S. Federal government are not copyrighted. If you obtain a government document from the net, you are frëe to copy and distribute the document. I have found plenty of great content about finance, retirement, health, business, and traveling on government websites.

To search for content offered by the United States government, go to http://www.google.com/unclesam.

Article Directories
There are thöusands of writers on the internet and many of them would love for you to reprint their articles on your website. You can find thöusands of frëe web articles at the following article directories.

GoArticles.com
EzineArticles.com
ArticleCity.com

Interviews
I consider interviews to be one of the best sources of quality content for your site. Simply interview industry professionals and post the recording and transcript on your website. This allows you to create original content very quickly.

Don’t be afraid to ask for an interview, most experts would be delighted to speak with you. Remember, this is probably one of their greatest passions. If you ask them politely, your chances for landing an interview are good.

You can conduct an interview in person, over the telephone, or even through an e-mailed questionaire.

RSS Feeds
RSS is changing the way we consume information online. In addition, it has also provided thöusands of new content sources for the online publisher. RSS is simply a file format similar to XML that is used by publishers to make their content available to others in a format that can be easily understood by web publishing software and content aggregators.

By using RSS feeds, you can enhance the content on your site without ever writing a single word. And remember, on the Internet, content is King.

Want to put Amazon products on your site, updated news from the New York Times, financial advice from Motley Fool, or press releases from PRWeb?

This is all possible with RSS. No matter what type of information you are looking for, RSS can provide you with a constant stream of updated content for your web site.

To search for an RSS feed to enhance your own website, go to Syndic8.com. You can even mix and match a variety of rss feeds at RSSMix.com.

Facts & Statistics
Looking for facts or figures to put on your website? Take a look at some of the sources below. You’ll likely be surprised how many facts, figures, and definitions are available in the public domain.

The CIA World Factbook provides a number of statistics on countries, territories, and dependencies. Each profile tracks such demographics as population, ethnicity, and literacy rates, as well as political, geographical and economic data.

http://www.census.gov/: One of the largest repositories for data and statistics related to the U.S.

http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Main_Page: One of the best encyclopedia’s ever written was published over 90 years ago. Search over 40,000 articles, all of which are available for publication on your own site.

http://www.bibliomania.com/2/3/257/frameset.html: A searchable interface of the 1913 public domain Webster’s dictionary.

Private Label Articles
Private label articles can be bought for pennies per article. This is possible because they are sold in bülk.

Many people criticize these articles and have declared them as worthless. However, I am here to tell you that private label articles can be very powerful when used appropriately.

Unless you have hours of frëe time every day, it is unlikely that you are going to be able to create the amount of quality content that your web site deserves. This is where private label content enters the picture.

You can use private label articles to:

 

  • Add content to your web site.
  • Acquire hundreds of inbound links by syndicating the articles to article directories.
  • Create a frëe report for your visitors and other website publishers.
  • Create an information-packed RSS feed.

However, the key to using private label articles effectively is to optimize them. Straight out of the box, these articles are near worthless. To give them value, you must add your own touch.

Inject your personality into the article. Combine multiple articles and do some additional touch-ups to ensure that the article is in top shape for your readers.

Once you are finished you can add your resource box and send it off to article directories and website publishers.

If you are looking for one of the top private label article providers, go to InfoGoRound.com.

Images
Quality images can make your content much more inviting and keep people at your site for longer periods of time. Fortunately, there is a site that offers thöusands of pictures completely frëe of charge. Find it at Stock.XCHNG.

Quotes
Quotes can give your website a special touch. Quotes provide interesting content in addition to an element of credibility. I often like to add related quotes to my web site simply to engage the reader’s attention.

To find some quotes for your website, go to QuoteLand.com.

In the end, you always want your content to be unique. Not for the search engines, but for your visitors. With quality content comes quality links. Once you have built up a reputation for delivering unique content, you will nevër have to worry about having an audience eager to visit your website.

 

About The Author
Kim Roach is a staff writer and editor for the SiteProNews and SEO-News newsletters. You can contact Kim at: kim @ seo-news.com

 

 

If You Want To REALLY Promote Your Site, Here’s How…

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 3:41 pm

If You Want To REALLY Promote Your Site, Here’s How…
By Steve Shaw (c) 2006
Site promotion gimmicks and traffïc techniques come and go, but the ones that really work are those that stand the test of time. This article highlights what I consider to be the most effective methods to promote your web site of all time.


1. Get Your Site High In The Search Engines

Getting your site linked high in the search engines for your keywords and keyphrases.

One of the best ways to do this is to ensure your site has a good number of incoming links from quality sites – I discuss how to achieve this with relative ease below.

Also make sure that your site reflects the keywords/keyphrases that you are looking for – they should be in your title tag, your headline tags, and in your initial paragraphs. Don’t however over do it, or it will look like “keyword stuffing” and you will do more damage than good – just make sure they are there in a natural fashion.

Don’t aim for the most popular keywords, you will have a much harder time achieving success. Do some analysis using a tool such as WordTracker.com, and aim for keywords and keyphrases for which you have a fighting chance.


2. Create A Buzz

If your site offers something new and exciting, it creates a wow factor, and news about your site will spread far and wide with very little further effort on your part.

I stumbled on how effective this was myself almost by accident, when I created one of the very first popup generators online and added it to my first very amateurish web site. It was frëe for people to use, I did no promotion of it whatsoever, but people came from far and wide to use it, it was mentioned in many high profile ezines with large readerships, and it proved so successful that with some further development it turned into a piece of software that I still sell today on one of my sites.


3. Don’t Waste Your Visitors

Every visitor that comes to your site is hard-earned – so don’t ‘waste’ them. You want them to come back, to return time and time again. This will ensure your traffïc climbs over time, rather than remains static.

First, ensure your site doesn’t scare them away. Make it easy to use, visually appealing, and treat critical emails that you may receive from visitors from time to time like gold – while not all criticisms are valid representations of how the majority of visitors see your site, some of these emails can help you turn your business around if you listen in a positive manner instead of react negatively and defensively.

Secondly, try to subscribe as many visitors as possible to a list, so that you can correspond with them time and time again. Sending them news about your site for example will keep them coming back.


4. Pay-Per-Click Engines

Bidding for keywords on PPCs like Google Adwords won’t usually bring you large amounts of traffïc, but if you do it carefully, the traffïc it does bring you should be highly targeted and therefore very valuable.

The trick is to know your stats. Know exactly what your salës conversion rates are per keyword, and how much investmënt on each keyword is viable for you.

For example, let’s say your site sells artist pencils:

- If you are bidding $0.30 for the keyword ‘pencil’, each sale of a box of pencils brings you $10 profït, but if only 1 in 100 clicks for the keyword ‘pencil’ brings you a sale, you are spending $30 for each sale of $10, which is losing you a large amount of money.

- However, if you are bidding $0.10 for the keyphrase ‘artist pencils’, and 1 in 25 buys from your site, you are spending $2.50 on each sale that brings you a profït of $10, which is a profitable investmënt – i.e. it brings you a net profït of $7.50 per sale.
5. Strategic Linking

This can be one of the most important methods to generate traffïc over the long-term. Not only can you receive traffïc direct from the links, the more links there are, the higher your position will tend to be in the search engines.

In my opinion, I’ve nevër found reciprocal linking strategies particularly effective, i.e. you can spend a great deal of time building up single links to your site, and as they are reciprocal, they are not as effective as the non-reciprocal links that the search engines prefer. The fact is that search engines know about reciprocal linking strategies, and reciprocal links only tell the search engines that you have a reciprocal linking strategy, not that your site is an effective resource that other sites are willingly linking to in a more natural fashion.

The following two methods are in my opinion the most effective ways to build up links, and concentrating on these can repay dividends over the long-term:

a. Article Submissions

The idea here is that you write an article that other webmasters and publishers can freely reprint on their web sites. Other sites and publishers desperately need content – you simply provide it. The pay-off for you is that to reprint it, they have to include your resource box that contains a link to your web site, and in the majority of cases, the link will be of the valuable non-reciprocal kind.

By writing your article and then distributing it as widely as possible, you can end up with hundreds of incoming links to your site from other quality web sites. This can be the most effective site promotion strategy there is.

(For more detailed information on how to do this, you can subscribe to a frëe course at http://www.takanomi.com/publish-articles.php.

b. Your Own Affïliate Program

With an affïliate program, people link to your site and receive a commission on any salës that result from their referrals.

This provides a strong encouragement for others to provide links to your site – the trick is to ensure the affïliate link actually links direct to your domain and not through a third-party site, otherwise they will get the benefit from the link rather than you.
About The Author
Steve Shaw provides systems and software for effective e-marketing. His article distribution system can lead to hundreds of valuable incoming non-reciprocal links to your web site. Find out more at: SubmitYourArticle.com.

 

February 8, 2006

The Death of Google Adsense And Other Myths

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 4:08 pm
The Death of Google Adsense And Other Myths
By Titus Hoskins (c) 2006

Recent changes in the Google Adsense program has many online website owners and marketers seriously concerned. Many have seen their Adsense profíts and income flatline… seen their four or five figure monthly Adsense income disappear overnight. For many the Google Adsense bubble has burst.What happened? 

First, Google made a change in its Adsense program, letting advertisers choose between putting their ads in the search results or on the content pages of Adsense publishers. Search won out and started to receive the higher bids. Search results convert better than content ads.

Next, Google has cracked down on Junk Adsense sites, like they should. These sites consisted mainly of software generated re-hashed search engine links and were totally annoying to say the least. But Google also cracked down on ‘squeeze pages’ or ‘affilíate landing pages’ – a lucrative source of income for many online marketers, mainly because these pages helped marketers build an opt-ín list or use permission based email.

The results of these changes produced an Adsense meltdown for many online marketers.

Some Internet marketers are speculating recent changes could even mean the death of Adsense. One online marketer, Scott Boulch even published a free report entitled ‘The Death of Adsense”.

Many affilíate marketers would agree with Boulch on some of his points, especially the obvious fact that using Adsense on your web content is starting on the bottom rung of the online marketing ladder. Instead of receiving pennies per clíck with Adsense, alert marketers and webmasters have already discovered that by using CPA (Cost-Per-Action) and direct affilíate links, they can produce significantly more revenue from their web pages. Why eärn pennies per clíck when you can eärn $5, $10 or OVER $100 per clíck?

But the fine people at Google are catching on…

In the past Google has made its own swing to the Cost-Per-Action direction with its referral system for the Firefox Browser and giving webmasters credít for signing up Adwords and Adsense accounts.

Many online marketers believe Google needs to expand on these baby steps and open their Adsense affilíate program up to third party products/advertisers. In a recent company statement Google offered some hope: “We’re always looking for new ways to provide effective and useful features to advertisers, publishers, and users,” the company stated “As part of these efforts we are currently testing a cost-per-action (CPA) pricing model to give advertisers more flexibility and provide publishers another way to eärn revenue through AdSense.” Basically, in cost-per-action, advertisers pay for leads, purchases or customer acquisition. It would help with the clíck fraud issue and the monetary returns could potentially make Adsense’s revenues pale in comparison.

As more and more commerce goes online… acquiring customers for such diverse services as ínsurance, real estate, telephone, marketing, web hostíng, travel, mörtgage loans, cable TV, banking… you name it, almost any service or product sold in the marketplace is now turning to the Internet for customers and lifelong clients.

Enormous sums of monëy will change hands. Perhaps, the most lucrative of these is customer acquisition. Advertisers are turning to the Internet and webmasters/marketers for acquiring these lifelong customers for their respective services and products. Businesses and companies are quickly realizing paying an attractive lead generating fee/commission is smart business. They quickly build a client base for their services or products and quickly recoup their expenses – realizing in the long run these leads will generate huge profíts.

It can also mean huge profíts for the CPA networks like ValueClick’s Commission Junction and Rakuten’s LinkShare who supply the advertisers with publishers and website marketers to harvest these leads. It can be a lucrative venture for all involved, especially for those online marketers who have cornered the search engines for lucrative niche markets in big ticket items. Even small ticket items pay quite well for those marketers who know how to market online.

Contextual advertising is fine, but CPA (Cost-Per-Action) will offer much better returns for the website owner. Making any profitable site much more profitable. It will and is opening up a whole area of marketing opportunities that nevër existed before we had the Internet. Creating a complex structure of advertisers, publishers and the Affilíate/CPA companies that connect the two.

Of course, cutting out the middle man has always been even a more profitable venture for most marketers. As more and more webmasters realize they can make much more with dealing directly with companies, rather than going through a middle process like Google Adsense or the countless other affilíate/CPA networks … online marketers can reap even bigger rewards.

For an online marketer when you get a telephone call or email from the CEO or the affilíate manager with a company or service you’re promoting with your website – you know you have made it! Dealing directly with a company usually means bigger commissions and special exclusive deals just for you or your sites.

Only fly in the ointment, all that extra paperwork and business wheeling and dealing. Many marketers and website owners like the idea of someone else handling all the tracking, collecting payments, promotional materials… they just like to sit back and build more websites and content. It gives the affilíate marketer a lifestyle that they are looking for on the web. They just like to market and promote with their sites and let someone else worry about the details. Therefore, there will always be a place for contextual ads like Google Adsense… “Rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated.”

However, could CPA be a better alternative for the current Adsense contextual ads?

Google would be the natural choice for a middleman if there ever was one. Besides, many savvy marketers know the Google brand name is trusted online, any product/service promoted through Google would be an easy sell. Many argue Google already dominates the web, why should it not be the one to handle these CPA transactions through its Adsense program.

On the flip side, over countless updates and changes to its indexing, many webmasters have experienced more than a few negative dealings with Google. Many have won, many have lost in this Google Age, but all have realized riding the Google Search Engine is like running with the bulls at Pamplona, totally thrilling unless you’re one of the unfortunate few who get trampled in the process.

About The Author
The author is a former teacher who now works full-time online operating numerous websites, including two sites on Internet marketing. For the latest web marketing tools try: http://www.bizwaremagic.com. For the lastest trade information in your own industry try: http://bizwaremagic.tradepub.com.
2006 Titus Hoskins. This article may be freely distributed if this resource box stays attached.

 

February 7, 2006

Web Standards, Browsers and Designing For The Future

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 4:10 pm
Web Standards, Browsers and Designing For The Future
By James Opiko (c) 2006

At present, a vast majority of webmasters are designing for IE (Internet Explorer) 6, which is not as W3C standards compliant as is FireFox, Netscape, Safari and Opera.In my article – “The importance of sound website design & search spiders to Internet Marketers,” I mentioned the importance of a designer being cognizant of the fact that web browser standards are not yet fully harmonized – a web page that looks great in Internet Explorer (6) might look hideous in a Mozilla based browser like FireFox or Netscape. 

I also noted that with the explosion of devices with which to serve Internet applications, compliance with W3C standards has become critical.

When the final release for IE 7 for Windows XP, Server 2003 & Vista is launched, hopefully before the end of 2006, the tables will be turned, so to speak.

Internet Explorer 7 will be more standards compliant and your HTML code will be subject to much more rigorous interpretation than is the case with IE 6, consequently some web pages that look fine in IE 6 might not look the same IE 7.

In IE 7 Microsoft has made a solemn effort to fix the browsers acquiescence to W3C standards and CSS(Cascading Style Sheets) compatibility. CSS interpretation as recommended by W3C has been improved tremendously giving designers and developers more leverage in functionality for cross-browser design.

Microsoft asserts that they are taking W3C compatibility issues seriously.

Concisely what this means is that IE 7 will tend to interpret your web page code more scrupulously than before.

Therefore, if you have been designing your pages and have not bothered to chëck how they render in W3C Standards Compliant browsers like FireFox, you may be in for a rude shock when IE 7 finally rolls out.

If you have not been incorporating W3C Web standards in your design strategy you may need to re-design for IE 7.

How should you go about it?

Design for “strict” browsers like FireFox first. Not only is FireFox a more standards-compliant browser but it is also the primary competitor to Internet Explorer. A contender backed by Google’s marketing machine — and therefore, is not likely do “a Netscape” on designers.

Prior and up to IE 4.x, Netscape was the leading browser in the market with almost 80% of the market, but in a bid to force the issue culminating with proprietary goofs by AOL to whom Netscape sold out, they screwed up big time with versions 4 up to 6. A bitter war of attrition with Microsoft in the late nineties did not help either.

Microsoft grabbed the opportuníty and gobbled the Browser market overnight.

With version 7+ Netscape has been revived. How well it will compete with IE and FireFox remains to be seen.

I will be the first to admit that most the web pages I have built in the last several years are not always standards compliant… and so are ninety five percent of other web pages — as I stated in my previous article, “if strict W3C standards were to be enforced in browsers, most websites would go out of business.”

To design for FireFox a designer needs to combine Valid CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) for “look and feel” and W3C compliant HTML for web page structure.

The combination of these two design strategies is powerful in that it elicits tremendous flexibility, ease of maintenance and opens up extensive possibilities in website design. The benefits are rewarding, and every webmaster should attempt to utilize this two pronged scheme in their design routine.

Making changes to and/or styling a site designed with CSS is much easier and more elegant than messing around with a traditional table-based design.

CSS may look intimidating to a first-timer but once you familiarize yourself with the basics you can progressively harness the power of CSS to your full benefit. In addition, most web page design tools such as Dreamweaver or FrontPage have built-in modules with which you can automatically generate CSS code, which you can then view in a plain text editor for study purposes.

To aid you in your CSS endeavor you need the following developer tools: Web Developer Extension for FireFox and the Internet Explorer Developer Toolbar. Great time-saving tools for creating, understanding, and troubleshooting Web pages.

As a matter of fact, by installing some of the 1,500+ available FireFox extensions you can eliminate the need for quite a chunk of standalone desktop applications.

After designing your Web page remember to use a MarkUp Validation Service to chëck whether your Web page conforms to W3C recommendations. If there are errors, the validator will notify you of them and suggest corrections.

Also, remember that when designing using W3C standards guidelines a lot of code(tags) that were very valid in the “Pre-Standards” era have completely depreciated and will be ignored completely by browsers. If you ignore these errors during validation, your web pages might not render correctly.

In many instances, you may nevër be able to achieve 100% HTML or XHTML validation. In such cases you may want put the following DOCTYPE declaration in your document — at the top of your web page before the tag:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN”>

A “Document Type Definition” or DTD supplies Web browsers with information about which (X)HTML specification your web page is built upon, which instructs the Browser how to render the page for viewing.

In the example captioned above a standards compliant browser will interpret your web page as an HTML 4.01 document, and because it is marked as “Transitional,” it will display it in “quirks mode,” meaning that the browser will forgo the strict standards mode, and display your page like it would be displayed in older “non-strict” browsers, while still supporting any tags developed after IE 4, Netscape 4 and others.

On the contrary, the following DOCTYPE declaration tells the standards compliant browsers that your web page should be displayed in strict compliance with the DOCTYPE declaration.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN”>

A complete list of recommended DTDs can be found at the W3C Website.

If you leave the DOCTYPE out, the browsers automatically switch to “quirks mode,” therefore, it is important to include the DOCTYPE declaration on every web page that you build in order for it to be rendered correctly.

If your Web pages render well in FireFox at present you probably will not encounter any major problems in IE 7 other than minor adjustments here and there. However, I think a realistic designer should at least make a meaningful attempt to follow W3C guidelines for it is the correct way forward.

Do it now so that you will be ready for the future…re-designs and total overhauls are a time consuming and painful process. A process, which becomes much easier if your initial design incorporated structurally clean and modular (X)HTML with CSS compliance.

About The Author
James Opiko writes for AfroArticles.com. Get free Online Coding Tools, Audio Code Generator Software for your website, emails & newsletters.

 

 

February 6, 2006

Using Images for SEO

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 3:58 pm

Using Images for SEO
By John Case (c) 2006
Humans vs. Search EnginesHuman visitors and search engine robots that visit websites and index information about them look for different things in a page. People like to see an attractive layout with nice pictures and graphics, animation, easy-to-locate navigation, and friendly greetings like “Welcome to Annie’s Online Shop” at the top of a page. Search engines, on the other hand, like sites that have lots of textual content, good site structure (sitemaps, consistent linking style), and a meaningful phrase such as “Chicago Area Florist” as the heading of a page. While search engines can read the “alt image” tags of graphics, they cannot “look at” pictures the way a human visitor can, and far prefer text.

Replacing Text with Images

One way to work around this paradox is to shift some of the text that search engines have no interest in over to graphics. For example friendly greetings like “Welcome to Our Site” or “Annie’s Online Shop” work best as header graphics.

Creating a header graphic in a graphic editing program like Photoshop, Illustrator, or Fireworks has the advantage of letting you know exactly what that part of your site will look like to visitors. If you create a header or navigation bar with text, you are limited to a common set of fonts. If you use a fancy font that is installed on your computer, your page will look great to you, but when a visitor who does not have that font on their computer visits your site, their browser’s default font will be used and that nice aspect of your site will disappear. By making your header or navigation button images, you are free to use any of the fonts on your computer, and can be sure they will display the same way to your visitors.

Another advantage of using a header graphic is that you can remove words irrelevant to your target keywords from your textual content. When search engine robots visit a site, they read pages from left to right, top to bottom. The first 20-25 words and last 20-25 words of your text content are especially important, and you want to make sure to include your target keywords within these sections. If at all possible, your primary target keyword phrase should be the very first text in your page. That is, if you are able to make a natural-sounding sentence beginning with it. If your page begins with “Welcome to our site!”, then you are pushing your keyword further away from the starting point of your text.

The first line of the main text on your page should be in heading format, with H1 tags (In html code it will look like this: <h1>London Hotels</h1>), and should contain your target keyword. However, you may want to add a greeting above the heading (“Welcome to Our Site!” for example). Since this is a very general phrase, with no relevance to any target keyword, it is best to make this a graphic.

If your site already has a greeting such as “Welcome to Our Site” in text at the top of your main page, it is relatively easy to convert this to a graphic, as follows.


  • Open your page in an internet browser.
  • Push the “Print Screen” button on your keyboard.
  • Open a photo editing program, such as Photoshop.
  • Create a new document and select Edit>Paste or Ctrl+V on your keyboard. The screenshot will be pasted on the blank document.
  • Crop the image down to just the word or phrase you would like to replace, with only a little blank space around the edges.
  • Choose “Save as” or “Save for Web”, saving the file in the “Images” folder of your site.
  • In your site editor, such as Dreamweaver, simply open your page, delete that text, and drag and drop in the image you created. Save and upload your page.

Replacing Images with Text

Of course, the opposite might also be true of your current site. Your keywords might be displayed as graphics rather than text. In this case, you should either repeat those keywords in text in a way that looks natural, or get rid of the graphics altogether and replace them with text. The important thing is that your target keyword appears as text, as close to the beginning of the page as possible, and within H1 tags.

Alt Image Tags

“Alt image” tags are short pieces of text that are associated with a graphic. If the graphic cannot be displayed for some reason, or if someone has set up their browser to block images, the text is shown instead. (The “alt” is short for “alternative”.) Also, browsers designed for the sight impaired read out the text content of pages, and read the alt image tags as a way of describing a page.

Here is what an image tag looks like in html code:

<img src=”http://www.YourDomain.com/images/logo.gif” alt=”Your
Keyword image” width=”728″ height=”123″>

The alt image tag is this part:

alt=”Your Keyword image”

You can type the alt image tags directly into the html code. However, most html editors, such as Dreamweaver, give you an easier way to add an alt tag, and you should chëck in your software’s “Help” section.

Search engine robots do read and index alt image tags. However, since this text is normally hidden from human visitors, it is especially susceptible to keyword spamming (i.e. entering a massive string of keywords that “hide” behind the picture). For this reason, search engines are giving less importance to alt image tags. They still are important though, and having the tags on your pages can give you a slight edge over competitor sites that don’t have the tags. When adding alt image tags to your pages, keep the following points in mind:


  • Don’t go overboard. 4 or 5 words are plenty. Resist the temptation to pack in a long list of keywords because this could potentially get your site penalized by search engines or blacklisted from their directories.
  • The alt image tag should include the primary target keyword of your site.
  • The tag text should make sense if someone actually read it, and actually describe what is shown in the graphic.
  • Include “image,” “photo,” or “graphic” at the end of your short phrase. This prevents the search engines from flagging the tag as späm.

Using these techniques to organize the graphics on your site will give you a slight edge over the competition in the search engines.
About The Author
John Case is the author of Easy-Learn-To-Earn.com, a free guide to making an income online, and maintains an SEO site at AWordsWorth1000Pictures.com

February 5, 2006

Small Events Spell Seismic Shifts in Search

Filed under: Internet - Websites - SEO — admin @ 4:13 pm
Small Events Spell Seismic Shifts in Search
By Jim Hedger (c) 2006

I am going to step way out on a limb. I suspect, and am willing to propose; this short period is a major transition point in the history of search. I’m marking it in my archive, if only because a niece or nephew of mine might study economics and ask about it one day. A number of events over the past three weeks have set in motion a chain of events that will unfold over the remaining months of 2006, setting the stage for a bizarre and highly fluid 2007.On or about November 1, 2006, three interesting press releases found their ways into my inbox. While meditating over them with Hypertext The Cat (she who watches like vulture) and a cup of coffee, it occurred to me that Nov 1 was a watershed day in the history of online advertising. 

The first news item is extremely important for organic search and for information distribution in general. Ask and Lycos announced an alliance with Ask providing the organic, image and sponsored search results for Lycos users and Lycos pushing Ask search products. While the vast majority of search analysts will likely see this as the least important development in the first week of November, the combination of up-and-coming Ask with the old but still popular property Lycos signals a small shift in the search engine landscape.

We selected Ask.com over other providers because of its great search technology and tools like Zoom related search, which cannot be found on other engines,” said Brian Kalinowski, CEO of Lycos, in a press statement. “By partnering with Ask.com, we aim to deliver a world-class search experience to our millíons of Lycos users.”

Ask appears to finally be making its move and actively seeking partnerships with other smaller search firms. While it is good to see forward momentum for any search firm whose name does not begin with the letter G, it is also important that some sense of competition be re-injected into the organic search market.

In the same press statement, Ask CEO, Jim Lanzone said, “With stiff competition in the marketplace for syndication deals, we are pleased that Lycos recognized the merits of our search technology and advertising products. This new relationship will enable Ask.com to broaden its search offering to new users while also increasing the reach of Ask Sponsored Listings inventory.”

Ask.com is, in and of itself, an interesting search engine, and one whose story could have turned out very differently. It is nevër too late to start over and, 2006 has been a time of renewal at Ask. Owned and operated by the InterActive Corporation, Ask has new energy, an almost impossible goal its staff fully believes in, and, ultimately, a new lease on life. No longer defined by their popular but ineffective butler mascot, Ask has spent the past ten months reinventing itself by incorporating the strongest offerings from IAC such as Citysearch, Ticketmaster and Expedia into the search products it offers its users.

Things looked very different at this time last year for the small Oakland CA based company. Then again, things looked very different in the search engine marketplace at this time last year. Today, Ask appears to be looking for partners to bolster themselves as the smallest of the largest search entities. With the enormous lead Google has over the rest of the pack, these types of partnerships are both necessary and inevitable.

The second item from November 1st’s news is a story from British newspaper the Times Online saying Google’s rake of UK advertising monëy has surpassed Britain’s second largest advertising funded TV station. With annual revenues projected to surpass 900 million -poundUK this year, Google has blasted past Channel 4′s anticipated revenues of 800 million – poundUK.

Again, this might not seem like much of a surprise to long-term Internet watchers but it is a massive story for advertisers and media buyers who continue to spend the majority of their clients’ monies on traditional outlets like television, radio and print. The ad-purchase pendulum was already rapidly swinging away from the traditional media and reports like this only add momentum to that movement.

Channel 4 CEO Andy Duncan was quoted in the article saying, “People need to wake up and realise that this is not just a cyclical issue – there is deep structural change, rather like global warming.”

Comparing Google’s success in drawing revenues that would otherwise fund other advertising venues to Global Warming might seem a bit extreme at first glance however, Mr. Duncan is quite correct in his observation that the global advertising environment has altered so significantly that traditional assumptions no longer necessarily apply to the emerging realities. The monëy is not flowing the way it used to, threatening what was once solid ground with accelerating submersion.

The biggest thing most of us will have to worry about in regards to Global Warming is if, not where, we will find lunch. Similarly, traditional media outlets are struggling to find ways to survive now that the rivers of wealth have been diverted to fund the efficiency of the electronic marketplace.

A third news item, a report published in the New York Times that has certainly been noted by media buyers shows how badly newspaper subscriptions have declined over last year while, at the same time, viewership of websites published by those same newspapers has increased by about 24%.

According to the article, the LATimes has lost 8% of its daily circulation. The Boston Globe is down by 10% for its Sunday edition. In 1984, circulation of major daily newspapers in the United States peaked at 63.3 million. Today, that number has decreased by about 1/3 to 43.7 million. Clearly, not as many people are taking delivery or buying newspapers anymore. That doesn’t mean they are not reading them. According to the Newspaper Association of America, over 57 million people visited the websites of American newspapers in the third quarter of 2006.

The mainstream media marketplace is changing rapidly and ad buyers are having that reality hammered home to them time and time again. At the same time, the search engine marketplace is changing quickly as well.

Over the past several weeks, the search engine marketplace has shifted significantly with the third quarter reports from the two largest paid search entities, Google and Yahoo. What these reports revealed is that there is no longer any real competition in the PPC marketplace with Google literally sucking the profít away from Yahoo.

While the ceiling is not caving in at Yahoo, a weak fourth quarter report will not bode well for a revival of competition in paid search. Yahoo’s weakness however, provides an open lane-way for other formats and methods of paid-search advertising, one that Ask is only too happy to start to explore. Ask is not the only company exploring the paid-search marketplace. In the last couple of months, Microsoft’s adCenter has started to look like a serious player with inventory and interface improvements.

Now, I realize everything I have said above seems, on its own, either inconsequential or perfectly obvious. The inference I draw from these three stories, all of which appeared on November 1st is that these stories are both indicative of and propelled by, the seismic shifts happening in the search marketplace right now.

Weakness at Yahoo makes a place for Microsoft, Ask and its new alliances, and a host of other alternatives at the paid-search advertising table. On the table is a rapidly growing pile of monëy, most of which is likely going to go to Google. What’s left is a fortune worth fighting over. 2007 is going to be bizarre and highly fluid.
About The Author
Search marketing expert Jim Hedger is one of the most prolific writers in the search sector with articles appearing in numerous search related websites and newsletters, including SiteProNews, Search Engine Journal, ISEDB.com, and Search Engine Guide.

He is currently Senior Editor for the Jayde Online news sources SEO-News and SiteProNews. You can also find additional tips and news on webmaster and SEO topics by Jim at the SiteProNews blog.

 

Powered by WordPress

Recommended Websites Trade Association We Suggest

Rent A Server Server Beach Fast SEO Ranking
Read the Bible online Free Lyrics Search How to write a Press Release